Leaders Push for Transportation Projects, Spending [VIDEOS]

Transportation improvements are necessary to keep the economy growing, North Shore government leaders and businesspeople said at a forum this week.

North Shore leaders at the state and local level laid out the need for increased transportation spending this week, arguing that work will never cost less than it does now and continued improvements will help boost the economy.

The forum, held at the Old Town Hall in Salem, was organized by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council. In addition to a panel that included MBTA General Manager Beverly Scott and state Registrar of Motor Vehicles Rachel Kaprielian, about 100 people looked on from the audience including Wenham's MAPC representative, Harriet Davis.

"Can we make the case we need to do something about transportation?" asked state Senator Tom McGee, D-Lynn, chairman of the Legislature's transportation committee.

Salem Mayor Kimberley Driscoll said it is important that cities like Salem become partners with the state to complete transportation projects such as a $16 million project to improve Canal Street.

"Our small city cannot improve that corridor alone," she said.

She also pointed to the important role water can play in transportation, calling it an "underutilized transportation corridor."

Brian Cranney, owner of Cranney Companies in Danvers, said he relies on the roads every day to keep his businesses - which range from a self-storage facility to in-home electrical and plumbing repair, in business.

In Beverly, Mayor Bill Scanlon said continued spending on public transportation is important.

“Public transportation is so much more effective for moving people than cars on the road,” said Scanlon, mayor in a city with five train stations and two bus routes.

The goal, he said, is to transform public transportation from something people have to use to something they want to use.

Scanlon said the city has not be able to keep up on road improvements because of Chapter 90 state funding for road work.

For every city and town, the state’s Chapter 90 program is very important. It provides funding to communities to pay for local road projects.  While funding is projected to be $200 million in the coming year, it would take $562 million in spending per year to keep local roads in a “state of good repair,” said Jeff Beckwith, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association.

Equally important is that the money be dispersed early, said Mike Valenti, president of the Massachusetts Highway Association.

“We finally have recognition of Chapter 90,” he said, speaking from his seat in the audience. Construction companies hope to have a full 192 day work season, from March to November, he said. Without that time, “you are asking for something that is next to impossible,” he said, noting most municipal projects are planned using the full construction season. But often state funding is not released until mid-summer.

Above all, leaders worked to make the case that continued spending, including a proposed income tax hike and sales tax decrease that will increase tax revenue, is needed to make improvements and expand state transportation.

"It's not easy," McGee said. "We are asking people to come up with extra dollars for something important."

Anne Sweeney March 02, 2013 at 05:27 AM
Yes, let's spend more money on the MBTA, whether long busses or ride busses, they run empty most of the time and blow through thousands of dollars per week in costly fuel and maintenance. We inspected Funghua busses, why not MBTA and Ride busses, I bet the DOT and OSHA would have a field day. Public transportation is great as far as rail is concerned. But the bus system is antiquated and depends upon safe equipment and negotiable streets. We cannot fund a transportation system which uses inefficient, antiquated equipment. Ride busses have a Ford Triton or four hundred cubic inch gas guzzling engine. Long busses use Detroit Diesel and Cummins Diesel engines which suck down more gas than all of the passenger cars in Massachusetts combined on an anual basis. Why don't they use Japanese fuel efficient and hybrid busses ? Why not move over to non polluting propane busses, smaller, efficient busses. Limit the passenger load to six passengers. When you look at the short bus today offering Dialysis drop off and pick ups, they only transport two to four passengers at the most. Long busses should cut down on the number of busses by having more efficient routing. The MBTA software and personel do not utilize their transportation software by hiring software routing specialists who have the expertise in Time/Distance/Traffic/Congestion/Time of day/ Calculators to program routes and trips, thereby increasing transportation efficiencies.
Anne Sweeney March 02, 2013 at 05:37 AM
Drivers for the MBTA, supposedly Teamster Members, when working for, "The Ride" only make $12-14.00 per hour and some of that goes into Union Dues. These drivers work eight to ten hour shifts and perform twice as much physical work than the long bus drivers, who run their routes without having to get out of their seat. Yet, they make twice as much and have more benefits. If Beverly Scott is sincere at bettering transportation on the Northshore, she should review the upcoming contracts between the competing entities. Hopefully she will not follow in the tradition of past public officials, sit back and collect a pay check.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »