Attorney: Hamilton Water Supply Can Handle New Development

Hamilton's water withdrawals are below the amount allowed by a state permit, but the town faces lawsuits challenging the amount of water it uses.

The chances are slim that Hamilton will run out of drinking water any time soon. But the town may face some additional state restrictions on its usage in coming years, town officials said last week.

“The town presently has significant withdrawal capacity under our existing permit and continues to take steps to reduce seasonal water use through education, restrictions and capital investment,” wrote John Tomasz, director of the , in a letter to the Planning Board last week.

The issue of Hamilton's water supply came up in the Planning Board's consideration of permitting the Canter Brook Estates senior housing project.

Tomasz and Ray Miyares, special legal counsel for water issues, concluded that there was no concern about adding the townhouses proposed for the property or any other residential construction.

The Planning Board asked for the opinion on the town's water supply after Kerry Mackin, Executive Director of the Ipswich River Watershed Association, told the board last month that Hamilton was withdrawing more water than it would be allowed in the future.

The Ipswich River Watershed Association is a party to lawsuits challenging Hamilton's permit that allows the town to withdraw about a million gallons a day from its wells.

Over the last three years town residents have used an average of 613,000 gallons per day - slightly more in the summer months. That is well below the amount of water allowed under the permit, Tomasz wrote.

During the summer months, Hamilton is limited to 700,000 gallons per day.

The Ipswich River Watershed Association is challenging the town's permit claiming that the state allowed the town more than it should have because Hamilton, in the past, withdrew more than it needed to sell the extra water to Ipswich.

Now the additional withdrawal of water from the watershed is causing the river to have less water than is needed to protect the plants and wildlife, Mackin said.

The Department of Environmental Protection has been considering the issue for several years. And Miyares said he expects the DEP to rule on what is the “safe yield” for Hamilton in the next year or so.

At that time, DEP may lower the amount Hamilton can withdraw, he said.

Town Manager Michael Lombardo said Hamilton's water system needs work, but is better than many other towns on the North Shore.

He said he and the Board of Selectmen are working on a long-term capital improvement plan to replace some of the aging water pipes in Hamilton. He said he would present a plan to the Selectmen in February to fund the pipe replacement over the next several years.

About a third of the pipes leak water into the ground, Tomasz said. Those leaks result in the town losing about 2 million gallons of water per year, he said.

“Town residents may have a problem once they understand how much deferred maintenance there is to do,” Lombardo said.

To pay for the new pipes, the town may have to raise the water rates. But currently Hamilton's water rates are one of the lowest in the state, Lombardo said.

richard boroff January 18, 2012 at 12:24 AM
Townspeople did not like it when the school committee deferred maintenance on school buildings because of a lack of funding. What will these same people do with this problem? Richard Boroff Former member of the Regional School Committee
Marc Fortier January 19, 2012 at 08:53 PM
I realize this is a free service, but as per usual, the writing leaves the issue opaque, to say the least. Is the Ipswich Watershed Association challenging the 1 million gallon permit (700k in the Summer) because of the excess built into the permit because we used to sell to Ipswich? or is the Association seeking to lower the permit level below the ~613k gallons that we currently use? or both?
kerstin locherie August 10, 2012 at 06:59 AM
I was ove a friends house in Hamilton, she gave me a glass of ice water and then appologized when we both noticed that the water was yellow and full of suspended particles. She communicated her challenges, raising children and waste disposal system in your town. She felt bad because of the smell of her bi-weekly trash, attracting maggots in this summer heat. As far as the Hamilton/Wenham water supply. Your towns were offered an opportunity to link into the Wenham Lake Supply, but the Hamilton Town Counsel along with Wenham declined the offer as the cost at the time to tie in was $50,000.00. People should protest by not paying their water bills, what are you paying for anyway, undrinkable sludge.
Jay Burnham August 10, 2012 at 07:50 AM
What lack of funding? 10 years of Proposition 2.5 overrides? Costing the taxpayers more than $45 million cumulatively over the past 12 years? That's not a lack of funding. That's a lack of accountability.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »